குறியிடப்பட்டது
  • அகாடமிக் ஜர்னல்ஸ் டேட்டாபேஸ்
  • ஜெ கேட் திறக்கவும்
  • ஜெனமிக்ஸ் ஜர்னல்சீக்
  • கல்வி விசைகள்
  • JournalTOCகள்
  • சீனாவின் தேசிய அறிவு உள்கட்டமைப்பு (CNKI)
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
  • எலக்ட்ரானிக் ஜர்னல்ஸ் லைப்ரரி
  • RefSeek
  • ஹம்டார்ட் பல்கலைக்கழகம்
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • SWB ஆன்லைன் பட்டியல்
  • உயிரியல் மெய்நிகர் நூலகம் (vifabio)
  • பப்ளான்கள்
  • மருத்துவக் கல்வி மற்றும் ஆராய்ச்சிக்கான ஜெனீவா அறக்கட்டளை
  • யூரோ பப்
  • கூகுள் ஸ்காலர்
இந்தப் பக்கத்தைப் பகிரவும்
ஜர்னல் ஃப்ளையர்
Flyer image

சுருக்கம்

Effect of Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy Step-Down and Dosing Regimen on Measures of Asthma Control

David Price, Alison Chisholm, Elizabeth V Hillyer, Annie Burden, Julie von Ziegenweidt, Henrik Svedsater and Peter Dale

Background: Asthma guidelines recommend stepping down therapy to the lowest dose that maintains asthma control.

Objective: We sought to evaluate the effect of dosing frequency and baseline patient and treatment-related factors on database markers of asthma control after inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose step-down.

Methods: This retrospective observational study evaluated primary care patients (4-80 years old) with asthma prescribed twice-daily (BD) ICS (n=26,834) or ICS/long-acting β-agonist (LABA; n=20,814) for ≥ 1 year before ≥ 50% step-down in ICS dose, when they were switched to once-daily (QD) or remained on BD therapy. Study endpoints included exacerbations (oral corticosteroid prescription, unscheduled asthma-related hospital attendance, or general practice consultation for lower respiratory tract infection) and medication adherence.

Results: Significant improvements in most endpoints were recorded during the year after step-down, as compared with the prior year (baseline). The proportion of patients with no exacerbation during the baseline year vs. the year after step-down was as follows (p<0.001 for all comparisons): QD ICS cohort (73% baseline vs. 81% after step-down); BD ICS cohort (67% vs. 77%); QD ICS/LABA cohort (60% vs. 64%); BD ICS/LABA cohort (55% vs. 65%). Adherence improved significantly after step-down for all cohorts, most markedly for QD cohorts; and the average daily ICS dose as consumed by patients was higher for all but the QD ICS/LABA cohort despite the reduction in prescribed dose. Factors predicting loss of asthma control after step-down for patients controlled at baseline in either or both ICS and ICS/LABA populations included obesity, smoking, comorbid rhinitis, comorbid gastroesophageal reflux disease, and, during the baseline year, ≥ 7 short-acting β-agonist prescriptions, mean consumed ICS dose of ≥ 800 μg/day, and ≥ 4 primary care consultations.

Conclusion: Stepping down therapy is a valid management option and may improve asthma-related outcomes. Some improvements may result from increased adherence, particularly among patients switched to QD therapy.